Map_edited.png
Green.png
Yellow.png
Yellow.png
Green.png

What Is the Value of Having Full Network Visibility for Cybersecurity?



Common aphorisms heard each day in the cybersecurity industry will vary in their accuracy about our real challenges. For example, the oft-heard saying that “people are the real problem in cyber,” expresses the accurate situation where bad decisions by individuals can have real consequences on a network's health and its assets. But the saying also can be criticized for blaming users for badly designed systems. So “sayings” can be uneven in their usefulness.


One aphorism that does provide an accurate view, however, is the claim that “you cannot

secure what you cannot see.” This saying expresses the highly accurate situation where

network visibility serves as one of the most foundational aspects of modern cybersecurity. This

is true for information technology (IT) security teams with bad inventory or a lack of updated

architecture, and it is also true for network security teams with weak data, information, and

insights into their network.


What is Network Visibility?

The earliest attempts to understand networks came from the academic community in the form

of conceptual layered models. The familiar OSI model, for example, has helped network

engineers make sense of network operations from low-level hardware up through seven

successively abstract layers. This is the origin of references to so-called layer 3 packet-level and

layer 7 application-level networks.


These abstract models certainly help but are not operational enough. Therefore, network

security engineers have learned that visibility must come in the form of several practical views.


These have come mostly from practical experience dealing with network issues, incidents, and

attacks, and they are offered in the context of a different sort of taxonomy than OSI.

Specifically, networks today come in three different infrastructure deployment models:


  • On-Premise Networks. The salient aspect of an on-premise network is that the boundary of the network is defined by the enterprise. This has traditionally been done with a physical perimeter comprised of physical routers, firewalls and switches, but the equivalent can be accomplished virtually using software-defined firewalls. Creating visibility into an on-premise network is easier than cloud and hybrid alternatives, but it does carry other risks (e.g., insiders, east-west, lateral traversal, etc.)

  • Cloud Network. A cloud network is one that includes data and control plane support from a publicly accessible cloud infrastructure, such as the three major cloud-providers: AWS (Amazon Web Services), Microsoft's Azure and GCP (Google Cloud Platform. The industry often refers to such a network as a secure access service edge (SASE) configuration, but other designations exist such as a cloud-first network. Visibility into cloud networks requires specialized platforms that can delineate topology and virtual boundaries.

  • Hybrid Networks. A hybrid network, as its name implies, combines aspects of on- premise networks with cloud-based data and control planes. This type of arrangement is the most commonly found topology and includes the selective use of public cloud infrastructure, as well as software as a service (SaaS)-hosted applications, private data center hosted applications and on-premise workloads. Visibility here also requires special platforms and is usually considered the hardest among the three deployment models, as solutions usually specialize either in on-premise or cloud, but not both.



Figure 1-2. Three Modern Network Arrangements


Visibility into these networks must enable five different capabilities. These include: device-level

identification; analysis support for network activity and running queries and reports on the

network; alerting on anomalous behaviors; prediction capability to prevent threats and provide

detailed, root-cause analysis of these threats; and the development of insight to enable

optimal network management decisions. Such security capabilities must integrate with the day-

to-day network monitoring and administrative tasks performed to maintain network

infrastructure and services.


What Does Network Visibility Enable?

The ability to provide visibility into a network to support cybersecurity objectives has many

valuable implications for enterprise teams. These advantages will vary based on the local

context. For example, a network service provider will use visibility as a business differentiator

with its customers, whereas a bank will rely on visibility solely to reduce operational and

security risks. Nevertheless, the following advantages commonly result from network visibility:

  • Network Deployment Risk. Establishing visibility is a natural prerequisite to any network deployment activity. These include adding new nodes, connecting new devices, or making changes to routing, naming, or other network attributes. The idea of having visibility into a network before a meaningful change is made would seem to be based on pure common sense to any practical engineer—and yet it is often not done in many cases, due to the extreme challenge of having visibility into today’s complex, complicated networks.

  • Identification and Remediation of Vulnerabilities. The security task of identifying and remediating vulnerabilities in network devices and infrastructure benefits directly by having accurate and complete topological information. Without such visibility, it becomes difficult and even impossible, to find errors in configuration files, incorrect routes in network segments, ports that are left open, and unallowed communications, to name a few. As the network grows in size, data volume, and architectural complexity, these tasks become increasingly impossible.

  • Coverage of Network Entry and Exit Points. The most essential task for network security engineers involves understanding what data and access are allowed into the network, as well as what data and access can be directed outside the network. Equally important, these behaviors should be verified against their set of expected and allowed policies. Such entry and exit points define the paths an adversary can take to break into, and exit out of, a network for the purpose of a cyberattack and are referred to as “the network attack surface.” Security engineers want to minimize this surface as much as possible, without affecting the day-to-day network activities that are necessary for business operations.

These benefits should not be viewed as controversial in any way; all are based on common-

sense engineering principles. For this reason, TAG Cyber strongly recommends that security

teams demand a platform that provides essential control—namely, the creation of an

accurate and complete network blueprint. The next blog will address this important new

security requirement.


About TAG Cyber


TAG Cyber is a trusted cyber security research analyst firm, providing unbiased industry insights

and recommendations to security solution providers and Fortune 100 enterprises. Founded in

2016 by Dr. Edward Amoroso, former SVP/CSO of AT&T, the company bucks the trend of pay-

for-play research by offering in-depth research, market analysis, consulting, and personalized

content based on hundreds of engagements with clients and non-clients alike—all from a

former practitioner perspective.  


Copyright © 2022 TAG Cyber LLC. This report may not be reproduced, distributed, or shared without TAG Cyber’s written

permission. The material in this report is comprised of the opinions of the TAG Cyber analysts and is not to be interpreted as

consisting of factual assertions. All warranties regarding the correctness, usefulness, accuracy, or completeness of this report

are disclaimed herein.


 

Dr. Edward Amoroso

TAG Cyber, CEO

October 3, 2022